RE:RE:RE:Anonymous comments prove costlyThreatening to sue people who were invested in this company and are questioning thihngs Endzone. You do know that threatening to sue is illegal and given your ties to CNC does not put you in a good position.
How about we talk about things you keep dodging by responding by essentially calling people a poohead.
https://twitter.com/bigdude6669/status/1356415318185238528?lang=en
Waren Irwin also runs a website that serves as an education centre for those interested in mining. He had a number of concerns that still apply today.
1. High promotional expenditures for this company around 1 million dollars. Stocks are bought not sold and this is rather aggressive and seems like focussed on retail investors. OZ ran from $3 to over $20 plus they got a deal before CNC which you posted. They only have three bullboard posts.
2. Transportation costs related to hauling all the way to Kidd's Creek keeps going up and up with the prices of both gas and diesal. This I think is a risk when you have low overhead and nobody has a crystal ball as to how bad its going to get. So razor thin profits on a big low grade deposit presents risk over 10, 20, 30 or 40 years because no one can predict what the future holds. Whereas larger margins acts as a buffer for volatile energy prices.
3. He also wasn't impressed that someone engaged him a conversation immediately after signing up to Twitter and proclaiming that management was "great". He asked the individual if they worked for the company and don't recall getting an answer but only additional boosterism before being asked to go away.
Happened less than two years ago. And I don't think the above has changed.
EndZonefor7 wrote: LOL. Once again, retail investor here. You sound scared now.
CEOofEPO wrote:
Will all the investors on here be able to take you to court endzone for investment losses based on your posts?