RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Let's talk about Crescat and how Qunton appeared to be soEK,
I don't disagree. Drilling at angles towards a particular area of interest often gives the geos much more info on structural layout than a simple up and down. (Back in the day, wasn't it reported that Noranda was doing straight up and downers on what became NFG property (at Keats?).
I would fully expect the drills to go down at angle - but the thing that QH was noting was that there was such an obvious gap...and why is that?
Mind you, he did say that he only twigged it the night before when looking at that marvelous 3D rotational schemata that NFG provided. Easy to miss until he rotated it a certain way...and said "Why's that?" Likely never would have been seen without the 3D! Rare would be the bird that could have worked all that out off the cuff in his head!
So, a nod's as good as a wink...pop some holes and have a look! And they could be dusters - but at least we'll know.
el d
Evenkeel123 wrote: el d - I took it to mean that drilling at angles hit targets most often missed by going straight down.
It makes sense to me if the veins are only so wide, and you hit them when going on an angle.
I am not a geo or anything close, but it's common sense.
EK