RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:InterestingYou would be incorrect, as usual. When I inevested in BC, I made the case that SPs between $2 and even over $6 were still a fantastic investment because even selling 5% of the manufacturing capacity that PG was publicly pursuing, would have resulted in almost $150 million annual revenues. A measly 5%, so scale that up to "just" 10% or 15%.... Of course, as we know now, he couldn't even sell 1%....signalling to thr public a factor greater than 100 of what he actually delivered. And this was under my one alias which I had to retire because I could not retrieve my old password.
Thankfully, a few people I sold this opportunity of a lifetime did not buy into it so massive losses are just my family's.
And i do not try to discredit the technology. I do not care about the "technology". I just know that nobody wants it yet PG continued the narrative of great demand when he surely knew it was not the case. It would also appear that its distributors, if they exist, cannot sell it either. So, you can continue celebrating the engineering feat that has no commercial uptake and banging your fist on the table chanting how nobody understands it and are so wrong for not buying it. And in your narrative, you are saying that all these distributors don't know how to sell it.
Get a group together and offer KNR to sell you all the technology and rights to BC and have at it since the solution is so simple.
yearninyank wrote: "why didn't you design it with less computer chips".... "why was the first cartridge only good for one use?"...
You just can't help yourself. You clearly still have an agenda to discredit the BC technology. You have since day one in every name you post under here. To answer your disingenuous questions: Becuase inventing the machine required the machine to be built as invented. Oh, but you don't value the invention itself. I do. I invested in BC, not this Canadian HVAC company... what idiot would do that, right Paul?