RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Pennyf just jumped the sharkyeah, i programmed my bot. he is answering you.
so, i do not what you are talking about.
just check in with my bot.
this is deja vu all over again, when Fantasy Landers came over in the Townhall meeting days and made it personal about the posters. you guys were wrong then too. Poet cratered from about $1.30 to 23c or so. Ouch we are getting close again. wonder what caused that? Q3-4 orders anytime time now?
again this board is about Poet.
longpoet wrote: Hi Winter, after a few days I observe that your posting characteristics are that of a bot. Simple,short negative thoughts without any extended discussion or answering of direct questions is what bots are programmed to do. Its like you don't comprehend what someone is asking you. Like, in my case, asking you for the reasons you are positive on POET. Now,I don't think you are a bot neccessarily, its just that one observing may come to that conclusion. That said, I won't block you, because observing bot behavior is important in monitoring one's investment too.
wintersun10 wrote: Well, this is a discussion board on Poet and not on me or other posters, for starters.
And if you don't like my posts, you simply cannot handle the truth.
Your problem.
Again, there is no ban to help you censor other posters, get used to it.
longpoet wrote: OK,I have already told you to put me on ignore. Days ago. You still didn't answer my question. I have posted extensively in just a few days what I see as the positives in this investment and shall continue to do so, as well as point out any negatives. You dodge the issues and refuse to tell me what you see as the positives in your investment in POET. What is so hard about that?
wintersun10 wrote: sorry i did not know you were so sensitive.
next time i will use kits gloves in case you are not on ignore yet.
longpoet wrote: So what keeps you long POET? You didn't answer before. You just insulted me instead.
wintersun10 wrote: this is a prime example of posts that gets the poster on my ignore list.
pointless replies to pointless posters
argueing with posters that have gone over the edge
we have the ignore to use it.
and no this is not defamation, this is not bullying, this is just letting you know what experience has taught us(long time users of SH)
longpoet wrote: When I saw he had posted about GaAs, I had to do a double take. This bunch on here calling us names and discrediting POET and then post that POET's GaAs tech in not commercially viable. I am stunned at the unbelievable ignorance. These posters are the epitome of misinformation and misrepresentation. Talk about living in the past. Criticizing a company about a technology that the shelved 5 years ago? WUT? ROTFLMAO
Mackwheaton wrote: Killed any credibility he might have had with his latest post, where he said,
3) The underlying GaAs tech isn't commercially viable and too difficult to produce anything in a high yield low cost process"
GaAs technology!? Where have you been penny? GaAs technology was scuttled 5 years ago for the Optical Interposer, which is indeed a high yield platform (>400 chipsets per wafer) at a fraction of the cost of current bench assembly techniques. Poet has not spent a dime on GaAs.
You just tore up your bashing card penny, zero cred in those statements. Lies and disinformation have no place on a stock chat board.