RE:RE:Gunnar Dome Update - Re-Test Required (Credit to Bertie)I understand this concern - and honestly it motivated me to post that info here ASAP. Although I know those guys are just trying to be transparent, sometimes I think they risk saying too much for a public company. They need to be careful not to share material inside information in non-public ways. Here however, I don't know that the need to re-test samples (and the corresponding short delay) is really "material" information.
We were waiting on the Gunnar Dome test results, and now we know that we will need to wait a little while longer for those test results - I'm not sure that is really a big deal in the scheme of things. Think about it this way, if they had issued a news release/update saying that they needed to re-collect and re-test samples, they likely would have been criticized by many for a issuing a rather meaningless update (leaving us to speculate as to whie there was no additional information simultaneously being provided regarding the processing facity, which would have been the real elephant in the room).
Don't get me wrong - I do think DME has a lot of work to do in cleaning up the content and quality of its communications. But (1) they should be able to bring on people who can better button this up soon, and (2) personally I really don't think a short further delay on the Gunnar Dome results is that material (even if it is great interest for those of us who obsess over every word/update from the company).