Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

MEG Energy Corp T.MEG

Alternate Symbol(s):  MEGEF

MEG Energy Corp. is a Canada-based energy company focused on in-situ thermal oil production in the southern Athabasca oil region of Alberta, Canada. The Company is engaged in the development of enhanced oil recovery projects that utilize steam-assisted gravity drainage extraction methods to improve the economic recovery of oil. It transports and sells thermal oil (AWB) to customers throughout North America and internationally. The Company owns a 100% interest in over 410 square miles of mineral leases in the southern Athabasca oil region of Alberta, Canada and is primarily engaged in sustainable in situ thermal oil production at its Christina Lake Project. Christina Lake Project is a multi-phased project, located 150 kilometers south of Fort McMurray in northeast Alberta. It comprised of approximately 200 square kilometers of leases.


TSX:MEG - Post by User

Comment by jleer42on Dec 13, 2022 12:28pm
240 Views
Post# 35168749

RE:RE:RE:RE:Keystone

RE:RE:RE:RE:Keystone Not sure who you are directing this at, but my point is MEG is not as negatively impacted by the shutdown as other Canadian producers. MEG uses the Enbridge mainline not TMX.

From MEG's presentation "Currently ~60-65% of Christina Lake blend volumes have access to global pricing at the USGC"

cashtango00 wrote: With all due respect, the Keystone issue is definitely a negative for MEG, not for transportation issues as others are, but because of the increased WCS spread.  The minimal effect it may have on WTI is dwarfed by the negative WCS factor which is large.  For every $ 1 increase in the spread, MEG loses 45m cash flow. That's substantial for a company this size 


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>