For graphene007, DrJayser and All GRA ShareholdersUnderstand that I am of the quite supportable opinion being that should there not be a company press release specifically intended to disclose additional bonafide and bankable or "tangible deliverables" having being achieved on the part of either NanoXplore or the VoltaXplore enterprise, the NanoXplore share price would continue it's descent toward share price points most representative of the company's existing cash on hand.
Understand that older and doggedly still holding what are made to be incrementally more worth less portions of their respective NanoXplore equity positions (that would in part be me as well), have been fiscally pummeled here with NanoXplore since at least November 30, 2021.
Also understand that you and others will keep trying to jawbone the GRA share price higher for as long as you like, while NanoXplore remains in a adjusted EBITDA negative status conceivably during the this 2023 Q2 and throughout Q3 and Q4 of this 2023 fiscal year - I hope not and yet am prepared for such a possibility.
That's correct. Adjusted EBITDA negative financial figures are, as Mr. Nazarpour clearly indicated, possibly expected going forward during this five year period. Although I entirely agree with the very strategic reasoning as to why this could be the case (see the company's fantastic and very bullish 5 year business development investment plan which I clearly do support and was, however, not too pleased at all with having been provided the most brief of discriptions and lacking elaboration of by company representatives during the Q1 conference call), Mr. Nazarpour &Co made it abundantly clear that the company and a majority of the largest NanoXplore shareholders - obviously he and the company insiders could care less for NanoXplore "minority" shareholders like us - support this company potentially remaining unprofitable during this five year period.
As I alluded to here previously, I am not at this moment prepared to purchase additional NanoXplore shares until the GRA share price is potentially made to most accurately reflect NanoXplore's present cash on hand or perhaps even a share price which is most representative of "a discount to cash on hand".
That is correct. I am of the opinion being that a NanoXplore share price which is most closely relective of the company's cash on hand is more likely where a lacking of either imminent or nearer term (i.e. the next 3 months) "tangible deliverables" achievements disclosures on behalf of NanoXplore would somehow facilitate "the street" and certain various "interested participants" collectively in taking the NanoXplore share price down to.
Conveniently, it would perhaps be at that point, i.e. when cash value is most closely represented by the GRA share price, when the majority of NanoXplore's largest shareholders would have collectively scooped up all the available NanoXplore shares. Obviously they'd be doing so whilst any NanoXplore "minority" shareholders, investors who purchased GRA equities positions at prices anywhere extremely much higher than a share price most representative of the company's cash on hand, would be made to keep capitulating and selling into the could be created and sustained downward share price action.
The flushing out of NanoXplore "minority" shareholders could conceivably be quick or it could be a very slow and drawn out bleed, so to speak. Much like what we've experienced since at least November 30, 2021.
Again, I suspect we "minority" NanoXplore shareholders are going to be forced out of our respective GRA equity positions, this perhaps to the benefit of slowly accumulating NanoXplore insiders and/or those 50% of the largest NanoXplore shareholders, whom Mr. Nazarpour stated (during the Q1/2023 conference call) had clearly voiced their support of the company possibly not being profitable throughout this five year period and collectively clearly supported NanoXplore's five year strategic bussiness development 'investment' plan - as I clearly have supported and still maintain the dogged support of.