RE:Have to. The BS on this board is too much not to..tamaracktop wrote: Has it occurred to anyone here that the company just might be having trouble finding an underwriter?
Who would take on the potential liability?
Who would undewrite a company who's CEO makes a sport of selling?
Who would underwrite a company not covered by a single analyst?
Who would underwrite a company that has admitted fairly recently that they weren't fully compliant with the more stringent disclosure requirements of the TSX?
Why was the recent issue so small and non-brokered?
Hmph!
These questions look increasingly "legitimate" every day.
Hence not one single rational answer nor one remotely feasible answer.
What would happen if it came to light that someone other than a potential investor was looking hard at this company?
Looking at what's been "suggested" vs what's been delivered?
From the "Tesla of furnaces"?
What if "due diligence" doesn't just apply to investors?
And what if such "due diligence" were made public?
Think about that.
It's possible.