RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:NoShort - The Bottomless fool, The Tree Planter....I do understand the concept of enterprise value and that it reflects factors like debt and their cash position but even when you factors those things in on top of the 300 million dollar market cap reflected in the $1.7 share price you think it should be you are still left with approximately a 1:1 ratio (which itself isn't even a multiple). Stock prices are almost always a "multiple" and the reason for that is that there is an expectation they will continue to grow (which well has proven themselves to be able to do beyond expectations). You seem to say you have accounted for growth but you also suggest they don't even deserve to be accorded a "multiple" to reflect that.