RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Way to go Martel.... we can't let this happen!https://stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/t.bbd.a/bombardier-inc?replyto=35185530&mode=quote&threadid=35185241&source=bullboard#:~:text=Time%20someone%20fkd%20them%20hard%2C%20for%20the%20CSeries%20fiasco.%C2%A0
Here, here!! Very HARD!
BBDB859 wrote: I get it Stock. The point is that we can pull it off. Because our product is NOT inferior to theirs. Just saying here. That protesting in Canadian courts is different, than protesting in the US courts. Time someone fkd them hard, for the CSeries fiasco.
stockitnow wrote: This is a military contract. Not so easy to throw a bone to the local dog. Boeing has successfully protested so many USAF contract to lockheed, Airbus America, Rockwell to reverse bid because the government didnt follow guidelines to acquire the best value contract. Boeing knows how to play the lobbying game and litigate. Either way it will be sole source order. Canada won't operate mutli platform anyways. I would be happy to see Bombardier get the contract, but Boeing has all.their ducks lined up. Ba$turds.
BBDB859 wrote: True, but it won't hurt if they gave the contract to the Bomber. The Global is a great plane and is used widely in the world already .The way Just saying here. Trudeau should see it for exactly what it is, is that he's helping a great Canadian company to meantime. Fk boeing.
stockitnow wrote: Its good he came out and said that. But...
Boeing 737, landings gears are made by RTX - Collins out of Oakville ON, CAE out of Quebec makes the flight Sim that will be acquired for training, Honeywell Canada makes many of the electronic warfare equipment along with RTX in Midland ON with alot of high tech avionics used in Boeing Posedian. Bombardier is only providing Green fuselage of a global jet. And most of the Global components are made outside of Canada.
Boeing platform are used by many more Nato allies then Bombardier product. Boeing frame is based on proven 737 -700/800 platform, there parts are dime a dozzen and cheap and quick to acquire then Bombardier. Boeing life cycle cost is lower. Boeing has stronger case of industrial offset. Just my 2 cents.
vonSachsenanhal wrote: As President and CEO of Bombardier, I want to publicly share my concern that Canada, which is facing an important choice about the airborne surveillance of its vast borders, may be considering awarding a sole-source contract directly to Boeing.