RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Dealing with impact of long waits for Medical ImagingG1945V wrote: You probably don't even know what a Cardiac MRI looks like if it hits you in the head. Have you ever been under one? And do you seriously believe the VMS+ does not fit in dealing with the devasting impact of long waits for medical imaging of the heart? No one suggested that the article deals with or that it zeros in directly with the VMS+. Do you ever use your common sense?
G1945V
Now now, G lets be civil even if we disagree
Know the CT and MRI tech very well actually.
Then again-Your or my opinion matters little here G
It is the opinion of independent cardiologists(no not Ventripoint paid spokespeople) that matter, and ultimately sales that show demand for product
And as you know there was 15,000 in sales in the last 9 months with a 3 million loss
And zero sales in 2021 and again millions loss
WHAT did the Uk NICE expert panel(included a VPT paid consultant say about VPT?
"Two experts stated that, as VMS+ can be used with standard 2D echocardiography equipment, it requires less retraining of staff than current available 3D systems. However, the experts noted that VMS+ is more time consuming than fully automated echocardiograph systems, as it requires healthcare professionals to manually plot points on anatomical landmarks of the heart. Two experts felt that VMS+ would cost slightly more than current standard care due to the additional time it could take to complete an echocardiogram."
•"Experts advised that more evidence is needed before VMS+ can be routinely used in the NHS. Experts disagreed about where VMS+ would provide the most benefit in the care pathway. One expert felt that VMS+ would provide little additional value than existing technologies."
Source:NICE Experts Comments
Source:Abstracted from UK NICE MIB Ventripoint
Hardly. A resounding endorsement, and miles away from promoters wild claims here