Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Largo Inc LGO


Primary Symbol: T.LGO

Largo Inc. is a Canada-based producer and supplier of vanadium products. The Company’s segments include sales & trading, mine properties, corporate, exploration and evaluation properties (E&E properties), Largo Clean Energy and Largo Physical Vanadium. Its VPURE and VPURE+ products, which are sourced from one of the vanadium deposits at the Company's Maracas Menchen Mine in Brazil. The Company is also focused on the advancement of renewable energy storage solutions through Largo Clean Energy and its vanadium redox flow battery technology (VRFB). The Company is also engaged in the process of implementing a titanium dioxide pigment plant using feedstock sourced from its existing operations, in addition to advancing its United States-based clean energy division with its VCHARGE vanadium batteries. VPURE+ Flakes are used in the production of master alloys, where it provides high strength-to-weight ratios for the titanium alloy and aerospace industries.


TSX:LGO - Post by User

Comment by ceetongon Dec 24, 2022 8:44am
265 Views
Post# 35190944

RE:Question for board

RE:Question for board
The company sold one battery only. Ever! This was in summer of 2021. The company is unable to deliver this one battery up to the present day. It was scheduled to be commissioned by Q4-2022, was postponed to Q1-2023 and postponed again to Q2-2023 just recently. Does anybody consider this kind of performance encouraging for potential customers?

With regard to projections based on the "Guidehouse" papers one has to bear in mind this so-called "analysis" was paid for by Vanitec, an organisation whose sole objective is to "promote the use of vanadium bearing materials" representing the interests of a number of member companies including Glencore, Wogen Resources, TNG Ltd, VanadiumCorp, Avalon (Now Invinity), U.S. Vanadium, Black Rock Metals, Duferco, etc. This paper's "findings" are by no means neutral but extremely favourable  for Vanitec, its members, and the Vanadium industry as a whole.

Each and every piece of "research" presented by Vanadium producers, juniors or their respective cheerleaders refers to the lofty Guidehouse numbers as this very chat board demonstrates. A few youngsters pretent they couldn't see through it and continuously argue using either Guidehouse's figures or 3rd party "analysis" based on them.

As a matter of fact you cannot consume more Vanadium than is produced. Accordingly, if VRFBs require a doubling of the worl's Vanadium output till 2030, there are no more than two options: 1) Supply has to double, too, or 2) these VRFBs cannot be built. As simple as that. In order for new supply to come online, investment in new production capacity has to be incentivised. This requires a V price of at least $10, better $12+. Right now V2O5 is priced at $8.40. Of course Vanadium hopefuls like TNG Ltd. (a Vanitec member, TNG.AX), Australian Vanadium (AVL.AX), Technology Metals (TMT.AX), Vanadium Resources (VR8.AX), King River, Flinders Mines, Vanadiumcorp (VRB.TSXV), Nevada Vanadium, Ferroalloy Resources (FAR.L) tout their "world class", "first cost quartile" (LOL!) projects as all juniors do. They all display unrealistic opex figures only to see them debunked by reality, should they ever become actual producers.

Even current producers are unable to predict future production costs in the short term. Just 12 months ago Largo issued 2022 cost guidance of $3.30/lb (midpoint). Within just a couple of months this guidance had to be revised twice and now sits at $4.30 (midpoint), a jaw-dropping 30% higher than at the beginning of the year. With this in mind, how credible are production cost figures presented by juniors in their feasibility studies? Paid-for studies that these companies rely upon in their attempt to "trick" a bank into financing their project! They're all pie in the sky.

The VRFB marketing story is being told for more than 10 years now. I'm bored when I see it rehashed over and over again. Have a look at the charts of Redflow and Invinity, two VRFB manufactureres:

User image

User image

Do these charts indicate VRFB is a winner?

Also have a look at the charts of Bushveld Minerals and Largo Resources, two primary Vanadium producers:

User image

User image

Does this look like a winner?

Bottom line: Iincreased V demand and higher prices triggered by the VRFB technology are being talked about all the time. For many years. As it turns out though, VRFBs don't sell. Today the average battery storage project size is about 1/2 GWh. The few VRFBs that are being built (ex China) are less than 1% of it in size. Frankly, VRFB is losing out. (China is another story as the country boasts vast Vanadium resources and is builing its own vertically integrated, INDEPENDENT Vanadium supply chain. That's why V prices do not at all react to announcements of huge VRFBs being built there.) Should VRFBs at some point in time start to sell in quantities, it would likely become a trend for decades. Accordingly, there will be plenty of time to invest in the companies involved once it HAS started. No need to rush. Keep an eye on it and once it gets going, act accordingly. But don't get suckered by cheerleaders rehashing an old marketing story that maybe never comes to fruition.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>