Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Noranda Income Fund Unit T.NIF.UN


Primary Symbol: NNDIF

Noranda Income Fund is a Canadian based income trust. The fund owns the electrolytic zinc processing facility and ancillary assets located in Salaberry-de-Valleyfield, Quebec. It produces refined zinc metal and by-products from sourced zinc concentrates. The fund's long-term objective is to maximize unitholder value and provide monthly distributions to unitholders.


OTCPK:NNDIF - Post by User

Comment by Eric1212on Jan 10, 2023 3:17pm
102 Views
Post# 35214123

RE:What a real independent board does

RE:What a real independent board doesIt's mostly why under 5 $ per unit, everyones should agree to say no.

Over 5 $, i would understand somes say yes.

ZincDink wrote:
https://www.paidpromotionalmessages.com/companies/news/69243/xstrata-pulls-out-of-possible-acquisition-of-noranda-income-fund-8099.html

So back in 2009, the inedpendent board rejected the 3.9 offer as too low. Back then, they had 200 M$ of real debt (and the plant had an asset value of 300 M$, not like the false accounting the current board allows).

Now we have a plant with significant upgrades in better financial shape with huge improvement of TC and somehow GC thinks its generous to offer us less than half the valuation on the old, lower nameplate throughput, plant.

A real board would have laughed at the offer and not even considered it. Now we have a "independent" board condoining shennigans like this.

I certainly hope this bid fails, but have my doubts and can't understand why the courts are allowing a hostile takeover of minority shareholders with such a low ball share count. Court approved criminal action.

Well, we are getting 10 cents on the dollar, Trifigura paid only 5 cents on the dollar for the European mills (currently sitting idle, lol).


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>