RE:RE:RE:RE:Catalysts to Development & Share Price Let's not get ahead of ourselves. Trev said they haven't drilled a single hole between the surface deposits so joining PAK and SPARK is speculative atm, theoretical as he described it. The other question is whether the 2023 program WILL do any inbetween drilling, he described it as filling in some holes in the present model, doesn't sound like chasing more speculative stuff. We will see when they announce the new drill season.
Margin321 wrote:
I thought the discussion was whether Pak is continuous with up with Spark. They are 1800 meters apart and 600 of that distance (on trend) is taken up by Bolt. Establishing that continuity quickly should be a priority as that would be huge deal in terms of mine development. The size of the deposit is king, the width of the deposit is Queen (in terms of development of surface mine) and the purity of the deposit is a nice wildcard.
How far off id Pennick. Is the orebody is continuous to Pennick it would be a huge ore body.