TSXV:BTI.H - Post by User
Comment by
OttawaPeteron Jan 20, 2023 2:01pm
94 Views
Post# 35236096
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:2-million-dollar fee
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:2-million-dollar fee
G1945V wrote: OttawaPeter wrote:
ronrydell wrote: I agree....we could have $50 ADR's several years down the road if the glioblastoma trials worked and we got FDA approval....For us heavy share Bioasis holders...we would at least get our money back so both Medatech shareholders and Bioasis should vote yes (IMHO) and they hope and wait.
Bioasis will fold shortly staying on it's own, the requested for more debentures to give us warrants is long gone.
...in several years being key phrase. It is a bunch of bs and highly unlikely given how Midatech is driving themselves into ground
bioasis will not fold if handled by a small competent management team who isn't busy working on their other company, raising for other companies. DR had total conflict of interest & total hypocrit.
OttawaP, I assume that you are in the vote "NO" column based on your last statement.
Have you read fuzzyjr's post in regards to a "NO" vote? It seems pretty clear-cut. Do you agree?
"Consequences of a "no" vote: from IR"
https://stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/v.bti/bioasis-technologies-inc?postid=35230529 G1945V
Now I remember why I chose not to post on here prior to 2018...
of course I read it. Just don't believe the spin DR & other management are spewing. Someone write there is "added transparency" - ha! What a load...
Correct - firm NO vote. there ARE several other options bioasis should be exploring or should have explored - some non-dilutive! Not my job the educate this lot.
p.s. Thanks @Boomskid - your latest post thoughtful &'considered & is probably right. I dunno- but still voting no.