RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Why dividend 37, why do you keep saying the same irrelevant thing over and over again, dementia? Don't you think that you had a better chance of building some pride as a spell checker? I bet you know better about the company's obligations than the CEO? SG is the one who mentioned the likelihood of the VLE introducing a 'divided' with the new cashflow, so you have issues with that? You must be a genius of an investor to spend your valuable time on a company that has soo many obligations against it's cashflow, explaining why it can't or should not afford a dividend. If you only cared for decency, you would put time perspective to the timeline of requirement for the abandonment money, none of which is needed for a couple of years at least and with the earliest field to be abandoned already having required financial obligations met as per government guidelines. And only for that field to renew it's reserves which will lead to that abandonment being pushed further out. So yeah, keep whinning about spelling while trying to mask your real motives. SG is above your league. Take a break pal, divy will not be paid out of your pocket.