Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bombardier Inc. T.BBD.A

Alternate Symbol(s):  BDRPF | T.BBD.PR.B | BDRXF | T.BBD.PR.C | T.BBD.PR.D | BOMBF | BDRAF | T.BBD.B | BDRBF

Bombardier Inc. is a Canada-based manufacturer of business aircraft with a global network of service centers. The Company is focused on designing, manufacturing and servicing business jets. The Company has a worldwide fleet of more than 5,000 aircraft in service with a variety of multinational corporations, charter and fractional ownership providers, governments and private individuals. It operates aerostructure, assembly and completion facilities in Canada, the United States and Mexico. Its robust customer support network services the Learjet, Challenger and Global families of aircraft, and includes facilities in strategic locations in the United States and Canada, as well as in the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Switzerland, Austria, the United Arab Emirates, Singapore, China and Australia. The Company's jets include Challenger 350, Challenger 3500, Challenger 650, Global 5500, Global 6500, Global 7500 and Global 8000.


TSX:BBD.A - Post by User

Comment by BBDB859on Jan 20, 2023 4:10pm
250 Views
Post# 35236461

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Moody's acknowledgement of improving fundamentals

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Moody's acknowledgement of improving fundamentalsWell that's the key questions here Truth.

That's what I'm saying here to Temp and Flamingo, on the Credit ratings discussion.

Effeciency will be the key. Because once you can produce something faster and cheaper due Pearson Production capability then the customers will take notice. It's just common sense that people/customers would rather get their planes quicker because they have the Money. So why wait for slow production from other OEM's. I'm just saying that once Pearson comes on board those OEM's with shakey deals will lose quite a few of them, if the Bomber can produce their plane faster and cheaper. The Backlogs of these other OEM"s will get even more precarious or shaky. I'll tell you that Gulfstream's huge backlog will be the first to get scoffed (old guys (OG) term from the 1970's for stealling) from Pearsons production capability. 

With regard to your 15% to 20% production increases. I don't think you should put too much stock in that Truth. Don't get me wrong, they can increase production especially when they get Pearson on board. But why increase production when the orders aren't here? You can get into Inventory wows that way. That's one reason I say that EM will go to 10% to 15% increase's first, to see what the demand is in 2024. Who knows why Pearson's completion was delayed? I know the Developer of Pearson. Yet I'm sure that the delay from 2023 to 2024 construction wasn't intentional. It could have something to do with what we're saying here that EM & company decided to delay it, Just so that they can coincide Pearson to their production even more??? Otherwise overproduction will destroy them. This is one of the reasons that I'm very confident in this Management team. They know what they're doing to get that steady income stream.




Truthifest wrote: The Company's most recent guidance was 15-20% increase in deliveries this year over last.  That's before Pearson comes online.  I don't recall them saying what Pearson's capacity will be.  Any guesses, and will they even want to necessarily go there? Maybe their focus will be max efficiency instead of max units.


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>