RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:FutureMorningstar's current quantitative valuation of CZO is
just under a dollar at .98 which they call fair value. Being a quantitative model, it doesn't give any value to their R&D pipeline and the potential for future cash flows from any commercial out-licensing deals or other markets it may enter as a result. The shares are trading at a significant discount to the base business and much much more to the overall business.
As for their distibution agreement with Symrise, it's been renewed each time. They are long term partners and Symrise helped with the funding of the expansion of the plant years ago. J&J buys AV / BG from Ceapro via Symrise, I don't see Symrise jeopardizing their relationship with either J&J and Ceapro, there's no reason to.
prophetoffactz wrote: "There's a significant difference and no shame with promoting a company with a solid and profitable business so it trades at fair value"
What's the value of a business dependent on a 3 year agreement with its major distributor with a 3 year option? What happens if they go elsewhere in the next 2 years? Does CZO need to get control of distribution to see a higher multiple? If CZO had its own distribution with clearer control over the next ten years as opposed to next three could it double the multiple?
"CZO has a solid base business and a solid R&D pipeline."
We will know how solid the pipeline is once full data packages are released and validation is received from deals. We are still early and before the crowd; but we can get in for next to no cost as long as we are willing to wait.