Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

biOasis Technologies Ord Shs V.BTI.H

Alternate Symbol(s):  BIOAF

Bioasis Technologies Inc. is a Canada-based biopharmaceutical company focused on research and development of technologies and products intended for the treatment of patients with nervous system, including central nervous system, diseases and disorders. The Company is engaged in the development of its xB 3 platform, which is a peptide-based technology, for the transport of therapeutic agents, in particular biological products, across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). It is focused on both orphan drug indications, including brain cancers, and rare genetic neurodegenerative diseases and neuroinflammatory conditions. The Company is also focused on its Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) platform for treating rare and orphan neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory disorders. EGF is a protein that stimulates cell growth and differentiation, notably for myelin producing cells. Its development programs include xB3-001: Brain Metastases, xB3-002: Glioblastoma and xB3-007: Neurodegenerative Disease.


TSXV:BTI.H - Post by User

Comment by Boomskidon Jan 25, 2023 7:45am
116 Views
Post# 35244502

RE:RE:Hey narmac

RE:RE:Hey narmacIt's been a question raised for years about the odds of hiring a scientist as CEO who is also a good manager, financier, strategic thinker, and entrepreneur. (Dr. Ryan Watts, CEO of Denali makes the case that they exist, but he already has a job.) 

There is a persistent notion that any person smart enough to acquire a PhD must surely be smart enough to be a corporate leader. I have debated this with PhDs and physicians. My contention has always been that the achievement of acquiring a PhD may be as much a function of ambition and will power as it is of higher intelligence and innate capabilities. Some highly educated people are not suitable for leadership roles. Conversely, we all know of less educated people who are fantastic leaders,, managers and entrepreneurs.

I would love to have an hour with John Hemeon. He was hired into the top levels of Tim Hortons un the midst of a very successful period with Sysco. He was pitched by several companies to become CEO after the new owners of Tim Hortons replaced top management of TH with their own management people.

As a Bioasis board member for 3 years, being the only serious shareholder on the BoD, and with his background, I'd love to pick his brain about Bioasis. He's a corporate guy who is used to functioning within corporate hierarchies but he also showed aggressive strategic, management and entrepreneurial skills in his career. He is not the product of only naked ambition. He has serious capabilities. 

I have no idea whether he would discuss Bioasis in any context with anybody outside of the BoD but he could be very intersting to have a serious chat with.

I agree that a very capable CEO could be found outside the world of science. In fact, a real harda$$ CEO could be complemented by a dedicated and relevantly experienced scientist as Chief Science Officer.

In BD negotiations, pharmas throw their BD guys up against companies like Bioasis. With Ladenburg Thalmann, Bioasis was dealing with Madison Avenue and Wall St sharks. It may be the best thing to put a real business person in charge. Relevant scientific expertise can be hired. Corporate leadership is much harder to find.

Love your thoughts on this, narmac.

jd 
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>