Budaman wrote: See, now that is better trolling! You have definitely been studying the trolls of old. You mention a comparison of companies, followed by at least 3 mentions of possibly losing money.
Yet you derail your entire effort by stating "CEOs mommy". And then you end with a sad attempt at a bullying statement about being mentally unstable or an insider if you post positive things.
Still, I have hopes for you. Keep studying and one day you may be able to sow seeds of doubt in a credible manner.
The facts of this company are that it is a new start up, they are expanding rapidly, their numbers are increasing quarter over quarter and their food is really good.
I will modify my outlook and say this may hit .20/share plus this year.. I have a few shares in place and will continue to buy more.
In my opinion only. Good luck everyone - let the quarter over quarter increases speak for themselves. - Buda
northman wrote: This is the wrong analogy. Both of those business had deep pockets and ready access to the equity market at non-dilutive valuations.
If you look at this company as an equity investor you would need a significant chop in the valuation to consider giving them a million bucks, given that your likeliehood of losing it all is very high. Understanding that, and the fact that they need money very soon just to keep the lights on means that the clock is ticking.
1
I believe in the recent past they have just raised friends/family money (aka CEO's mommy), which could keep them going but will make for awkward family dinners in the coming years.
I'm not sure how to say this politely, but if you're coming on this board saying positive things about this companies future then my money is on your either being an inisider or a mental case.