OMG! What is a "alleged" Human Rights Code Violation?Is this what it's come to?
Thanks so much for proving every single point I made.
Know that in a rules based society and in a rules based geoploitical world order there have to be the obvious, i.e. rules and order.
My intent was clearly not to offend by stating facts and citing history and historical precedent in conveying a necessary message; it was in part to quite obviously inform, remind and to educate.
Alas, I expect that was in fact my error, i.e. expecting that others here could be allowed to learn from diverse opinions, more attuned observations, clear assessments of fact and the conveyance of such when replying to comments made here which were actually intended by the initiator of such comments, not myself obviously, as being offensive to Russian peoples.
How odd that I receive a notice of my having been accused of allegedly violating some sort of "human rights code" which actually served most specifically to censor and thereby actually violate my right to be protected by the very same "Human Rights Code" which I am unsupportably and clearly unjustifiably accused of having allegedly violated.
The person who reported me has won, although we should all note that such a would be claimed victory on the part of my false accuser was actually attained by way of violating the very same "Human Rights Code" which I am unsupportably and clearly unjustifiably accused of having allegedly violated.
Additionally, it is my sincere wish that in replying to my false accuser here that I not be additionally falsely accused of having allegedly violated such a human rights code by such a false accuser once again, as that would take what is clearly manipulative censorship to depths not required nor justifiable in any way shape or form.
In concluding, due to my prefering to keep this post as brief as possible, I will simply suggest that there is a great deal to be said for honest and genuine discourse and how while having established and consistently upheld the previously agreed to rules and order which facilitated such honest discourse, I was not ever the one to initiate the offending nor was I in any way the one to initiate the altering or changing of the clearly established rules based order supporting such requisite honest discourse here at these stockhouse investors bulletin boards.
In closing I'll leave my false accuser with the following thought.
When one is intentionally so feeble minded and lacking of requisite character and necesary intellect as to not be able to, in any way, effectively counter a encountered diverse opinion, observation and or "the crux of message" conveyed by another participant during a given discourse and when one feels the need to and does go about moving, mid match, the very goalposts which are representative of the very "rules based order" necesarily acting as the very foundation upon which all discourse amongst equal persons is to be sustained, such a clearly human rights code violating person, who chooses to move such golaposts mid match, does so in order to achieve what would clearly be discovered by such a offending person as being a pyrrhic victory.
Finally, I suggest that my false accuser not bother to complain in future about someone choosing to follow said person's example behavior and thus feel it is entirely now acceptable to incessantly move said goalposts as a tactic to censor and silence that which differs from and thus provides a diverse opinion, obvervation and/or evaluation of any given circumstance which you would elect to attempt to convey.