RE:Doc rating Let me see if I have this correct...
"Of course these changes based on performance". Followed by 2 "if's"... Then your post deteriorates DOC's potential after that... I love the "Current sp factor in negative growth and negative cash flow for 1 year"...
Not saying anyone should not invest; just pointing out that Las Vegas slot machines give better odds... ;-)
Golddetector wrote: My RBC account shows 4 buys an 2 hold for Doc. Average PT 0.63. Of course these changes based on performance. If doc for example wins a major contract or even if they continue 4 to 5 million additional contracts ( about 20% annual growth) which they did for the past 2qs in the next qs you can throw all these analytics into trash bin and sp will be adjusted accordingly to 2 or 3 ARR provided +be cash flow is established or even on the right path to. Current sp factor in negative growth and negative cash flow for 1 year due to the loss of Ontario government contract. Q4 will be the last q that will hear about this government contract impact on revenue.