Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

biOasis Technologies Ord Shs V.BTI.H

Alternate Symbol(s):  BIOAF

Bioasis Technologies Inc. is a Canada-based biopharmaceutical company focused on research and development of technologies and products intended for the treatment of patients with nervous system, including central nervous system, diseases and disorders. The Company is engaged in the development of its xB 3 platform, which is a peptide-based technology, for the transport of therapeutic agents, in particular biological products, across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). It is focused on both orphan drug indications, including brain cancers, and rare genetic neurodegenerative diseases and neuroinflammatory conditions. The Company is also focused on its Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) platform for treating rare and orphan neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory disorders. EGF is a protein that stimulates cell growth and differentiation, notably for myelin producing cells. Its development programs include xB3-001: Brain Metastases, xB3-002: Glioblastoma and xB3-007: Neurodegenerative Disease.


TSXV:BTI.H - Post by User

Comment by prophetoffactzon Feb 07, 2023 9:29pm
115 Views
Post# 35273435

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:British Columbia Securities Commission!!

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:British Columbia Securities Commission!!

",,but,,POF,,,,the impressive advanceent of Carina and the disasterous condition Bioasis is in is the CEOs responsibility..."

If Rathjen was incompetent Carina wouldn't have been able to raise all the money it has, including from institutional investors, advance its science preclinically, and get the 'green light' from the FDA to start clinical trials as it has. Rathjen has the required competence.

If you compare the number of deals, the size of the deals, and number of transformative deals negotiated(Cresence, Biodexa) Rathjen beats all previous CEOs at BTI. If she wasn't putting in the effort at BTI how did she achieve that? She beat them all despite a once-in-a-Century pandemic and the baggage of the past. 
 As noted, a previous Former Group Finance Director of Shire challenged anyone to find a company the size of Biodexa with more opportunity and a successful multi-billion fund endored the opportunity with US$20 million in potential cash. 

Rathjen has proven that she can get the required tasks done as with Carina and has achieved more than any previous BTI CEO at the same time. What went wrong at BTI? 

Any shareholder that was willing to walk the path of debt with a preclinical-stage biotech company accepted the significant risks. From scientific outcomes, to timelines, to financial risks adding debt to preclinical biotech is very risky during the best of times and no one saw what was coming. Should we blame Rathjen for a historic 25% of biotech trading below cash in 2022; and that preclinical biotech fared even worse? Again, BTI was also in debt to begin with at a time when so many biotech stocks weren't even worth their cash.

When Rathjen became CEO BTI also had no money and carried the baggage of two previous management teams that failed. The lead Herceptin program couldn't advance despite three management teams. Rathjen has been trying to change the strategic direction but in biotech that takes time. She changed the strategic focus to the intersection of Lysosomal Storage Disease, inflammation, and neurodegeneration leveraging the work with Chiesi. Chiesi's advance to FDA approval was thwarted by the FDA unexpectedly changing an 18 year old rule. Something appears to have happened with BTI's lab work.

BTI has been swamped with the unexpected, unprecedented, and misfortune. Life happens and no one is guarenteed a smooth path in preclinical biotech.

 





What is the difference between Carina and BTI?




 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>