RE:RE:Interesting committee they've formedI wouldn't disagree with your conclusion. But when an effort is completely dependent on experimentation into the unknown, the value of someone who's traveled that path a few hundred times more than you have and has a far more developed knowledgebase about data hypothesis, comparative/similar approaches and what-ifs, that can be really valuable. If they signed on to help understand the key issues, they should have the tools to get from data observation to theory to hypothsis to revised protocal (if they get there) pretty quickly. I guess one way to think about it is that new sets of highly experienced eyes can't hurt. May not help, but can't hurt given where they are. The possibiliity is there to conclude all the outcomes mentioned here from best to worst. But worst is already the assumption in the market.