I'll summarize it again, so it's not lost in the repliesYou state that Kevin said the price went from .07 to 2.35 in two months.
Kevin said that happened in a few months.
Stop saying that he said 2 months.
FACTS
That few months was 4 or 5 years. It was not 2 months as you have repeatedly stated that he said. Kevin said few month. More like 48-60 months.
There was a consolidation of shares during that period. 1 new share for every 3 shares.
The price peaked at $2.35.
About 30 months later (less than the stated few which was closer to 5 years). The price was in the low .20's.
That is after the 3-1 consolidation. So the price was back to about .07 if you want it to be equivalent.
The price went from 2.35 to the low .20's and the low .20's was after the consolidation.
He sold the company in the low .40's (again this is after the consolidation)
What Kevin said is actually true if you consider 5 years to be a couple of months.
If we do a 10-1 consolidation tomorrow and the price goes to $3.00.
Are you going to think you made 1000 % in one day?
Why do you refuse to listen to anything that I say?
If I say you misunderstood something and he did not say two months, why don't you check on that?
I'm not bashing.
I just think it looks bad when our CEO says things like that which are misleading, and then you add to the misunderstanding by continuing to say he said two months.
Why are you so scared to listen to the truth? Don't you want to really understand?
If he has to make statements like that without the facts, it destroys his creditbility.
I am not bashing. I am responding to your inaccurate post.
I am discussing the stock.