RE:RE:RE:VoltaXplore & the Inflation Reduction ActHello tinkvid
You suggested "Canada is now competing with the USA for the most part to source and manufacture locally."
Canada doesn't compete with the U.S, at least no so much as it competes with everyone else to be first in line to service the U.S. market for just about anything imaginable.
Canada has to know it's role; it's always "a supporting role" tinkvid.
As I mentioned and as I'll reiterate once again, "a non-exclusive licensing deal could have a selected global battery cells manufacturing partner and/or a certain EV manufacturer electing to build a duplicate facility with a larger 10GWh manufacturing capacity within New Hampshire U.S. and/or Europe"
I'll also suggest that Mr. Nazarpour &Co should have already secured the kind and qualit of licensee which I discribed tinkvid.
Simply have a look at what Solid Power inc representatives recently accomplished with BMW, as pertains to SLDP's licensing of it's proprietary process manufacturing and and associated IP and equipment to BMW for a initial cost of $20 Million.
Once again, I'll state that "if you want to sell all that graphene powder and/or operate all those graphene manufacturing modules for prospective co- manufacturing partners and customers, who better than a company which calls itself LG Global Graphene Battery Manufacturing Group or "LGGGBMG" to place NanoXplore's "Graphene BlackTM" powder and the company's technological manufacturing processes on the global map."
Elon Musk seemed to have pooh- poohed graphene enhanced batteries on a mass scale adoption not too long ago and it's not as though he is knocking on NanoXplore's door anytime soon, is he?
You stated, "Opportunities for NanoXplore and VoltaXplore are ever increasing and the latest Q2 #'s, institutions have taken notice."
That is great tinkvid.
Hopefully it didn't actually take me drawing institutional investors a very pretty picture here (lol), in order for such potential NanoXplore institutional investors to take note of the very message depicted and begin more aggressively supporting the GRA share price by way of steady accumulation of their respective NanoXplore equities holding positions.
Who knows, maybe it was the Q2/2023 positive EBITDA result (it is perhaps less doubtful than what I poropsed, lol, about what actually had "the tutes" taking note of NanoXplore, eh) which brought institutional shareholders over to more closely examining a potential much larger GRA equities holding being taken up by such now more interested institutional investors, e.g. index investments managers typically operating both on behalf of their high net worth clients and on behalf of their own skin in the game being first placed in a "front-running" position ahead of their captive clients.
Yes. Everyone who knows understands how index investments managers and/or their "friends" always tend to ensure to take up such quite profitable "front-running positions, yes.
Are such professionals now willing to send their preferred clients in NanoXplore's direction beore senting the overwhelming remaining majority of their clients toward taking up a equity position here with NanoXplore?
We are going to discover the answer to such a question when the NanoXpore share price is suddenly and seemingly for no explicable reason made to gap upward about $1.75 or so. It would be then that all the lower tiered investors being represented by such investments managers would be sent NanoXplore's way; thereby having the share price gap upward again from $5.00 or so.
Perhaps that is when Mr. Nazarpour & Co should have a quite timely disseminated company news item released. Hopefully it's a tangible diliverable being announced. After all, we can always put a dollar figure to such a kind of company business development, eh?
It's my art of the deal tinkvid.