RE:RE:NGC Has Trouble Coming It's Way From The U.S. Senate . . .Hello Harley103.
First, I am not fearmongering. I am stating opinion and providing information which is, IMO, quit relevant and serves to keep participants aware of what relevant factors are unfolding.
Second, I haven't ever sold short equities nor do I ever plan on doing so. Shorting equities is a good way to lose your shirt, so to speak.
Readers would do well to note that simply because I remain informed and clearly see the very potential for a naturally intended "spillover effect" into Canada of what is occurring within the U.S. Senate, specifically in terms of Senator Marco Robio and his introduction of legislation which would serve in expressly prohibiting any U.S. EV manufacturers or battery materials and battery cells manufacturing corporations from utilizing China based corporation owned proprietary process manufacturing technologies and IP or the prohibiting of such corporations from benefiting from various U.S "IRA" Governemt incentives, does not in any way mean to suggest that I expect everything else which Northern Graphite Corporation does in fact clearly have going in it's favor to be thrown out with the bathwater, so to speak.
More important than anything else which pertains to Northern Graphite Corporation, I quite intentionally purchased equities in the only existing graphite miner operating within North America for specific reasons.
It would be clear to anyone reading this that such specific reasons are not gone nor in any way diminished.
You'll note that when I suggest I may have lost my money here with NGC or stated "there goes my money", I was simply trying to point out a potential which is not any any way a certainty.
You'll also note that in a attempt to temper my comments regarding what U.S. Senator Marco Rubio is proposing and any expected potential for any knock on effects originating from such a "potentially" enacted U.S. law to spill over into Canada, I did clearly suggest that the simplest solution for both NGC and it's technology partner, Graphex Technologies LLC, in immediately countering any potentially pejorative effects resulting from such potentially enacted U.S. legislation in question, would be for the co-commercializing joint veturing partners to sell all the would be produced "BAM" into the Eroupean EV battery materials and battery cells manufacturing marketplace.
* Perhaps you are not aware Harley103.
Those representatives of European Union member states and and their counterparts operating within the U.S are, at the moment, on clearly divergent paths, this when it comes to both China based company owned proprietary technologies and technological manufacturing processes which are "perpetually licensed" to U.S. and also Canadian operating clients.
European interests are not now nor would they immediately align with the U.S. Government interests in utterly destroying the Chinese economic enterprise. That specific fact is most definitely "leveragable" and should be capitalized upon by or on behalf of persons such as Mr. Jacquemin et al. and by or on behalf of those persons administering over the affairs of furthering Canada's own economic security and national security imparatives.
Now there's the strategy.
Simply just let the U.S try to ban or introduce onerous tarrifs placed on vehicles utilizing battery materials components, battery cells and full battery packs exported by European EV manufatcurers collectively into the U.S.
If the U.S. warmongers want economic war against China (and that is what the sustained objective always is), they can't have it without going to financial and economic war against the European Union and other NATO member states - whether you agree or not, that's actually what is going on right now.
By way of it's foreign policy directives, the U.S. is already waging what is withought a doubt a war utilizing specific weapons meant to be creating and sustaining what is a manufactured and intended resulting persistent inflation against it's so called friendlies situated in Europe and throughout the world. I expect the U.S. doesn't want to go to overt economic war against it's "friendlies" in Europe' or does it?