RE:No news will be bad news Since about the time RG announced he negotiated a deal with some northern Alberta group to deal with the toxic waste we produce, we have pretty well been working of the macro around CMs. At that time we figured possibly Sherrit could be involved and possibly the toxic waste facility at swan hills could make some sense. Not a significant word or thought of who or what since.
so what have we been working with? Not a lot, other than our own BB imaginations lol and of which I am as guilty as the next in hopes that RG had something of significance going on....looking back and in between it's been a long time and somewhat of a blur.....today with what we know, it seems we are totally dependant and wishfull thing of that macro and what it may bring.
Mgt has done little to bring new hope in fact seems they are working off the macro as much as we are simply because so little is said to work with.
mgt may just be sitting back and asking what is it these people, who post and email and call us want from us? We don't have money what can we say? The answer is pretty simple, as a minimum get out there in the public and every possible meeting etc and show your face ( the face of FT who represent shareholders).
What would this project look like without RG who has given much of his life to this 5 billion deposit but can't seem to get it over the hump ...or better said out of the bottom of the Lassonde curve to move up that curve, In this macro. I am asking myself what is it that those in boardrooms who know about us ( and apparently are the ones who need to know) know, that we don't ?
RG and crew ( what's left of it) leave themselves, and by thier own doing, open to damning scrutiny and insults because of what ? Have to also ask how much of this can one take and it's not a way that most would want to leave the business. Changing one's stars and FT stars, takes effort of which we are seeing little....nothing of substance to work with. You make the wine, you drink it.