RE:RE:Nice to seeSamDiego wrote: Just think, if you didn`t display such exemplary leadership skills and hold such a charismatic influence over existing, and what would otherwise be new shareholders, this stock would have been trading at 0.165 cents and the added dilution would have been 2/3s less. Never in my life have I witnesses one man exert such a negative influence over the SP of a stock. What evil have you wrought over this world of Wi-Fi!
It's too good not to keep sharing Sam. Do you ever think where this company will get money from? That's the one thing none of your little band of merry men can answer. I don't think the three of you have much spare change to fund much of anything let alone buy a couple of shares in this penny stock. Could be wrong but I don't think so. How much did Royal lose on a stock again? You can't wrap your head around those numbers. Strange how you don't ask how he had that much money to risk on a stock? How did he make that much money to play a venture stock? Someone's got a top shelf home media system minus the projector but no extra money to invest into a penny stock he touts from what he posted. Does it bother you that much that people earned money and invested and took loss? Are you the guy that asks everyone how much everything cost them or what they paid? Good on Royal for actually putting his money down. You're more concerned about the loss then he is. That speaks volumes Sam. Don't forget that this is a business Sam. It needs money to keep the show going.