RE:LNGActually, that is just an accounting recification: negative $4.5 million spent on LNG Development. Catching up with an expense that was recognized more than a year earlier, and that they did not have to pay.
Goldboro costs since Q3 2021 have gone into General Administrative, which bumped up and remained flat until Q4 2022.... where it went back down.
And in the many pages you will only see the words Goldboro or LNG mentioned when they absoluteky have to, because of an acconting thing like that.
Kind of looks done to me.