Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Cascadia Minerals Ltd V.CAM

Alternate Symbol(s):  CAMNF

Metals & Mining Gold
Cascadia is a Canadian junior mining company focused on exploring for copper and gold in the Yukon and British Columbia . Cascadia's flagship Catch Property in the Yukon hosts a brand-new copper-gold porphyry discovery where inaugural drill results returned broad intervals of mineralization, including 116.60 m of 0.31% copper with 0.30 g/t gold. Catch exhibits extensive high-grade copper and gold mineralization across a 5 km long trend, with rock samples returning peak values of 3.88% copper and 30.00 g/t gold.


TSXV:CAM - Post by User

Cascadia Minerals Ltd > Looking good.
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
User Avatar Image
(145)
•••
Comment by givemeabreak1on Apr 14, 2023 9:15pm
163 Views
Post# 35396310

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Looking good.

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Looking good.imho
Seems I pointed out to everyone that the Victoria deal was no where close to the HL deal!  Even the naysayers who for some reason wanted .12 instead of .18 at the time of the deal?  Then again, some people struggle with simple math!  
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities