RE:RE:Some of you may not understand the implications of whatI was waiting for someone to bring up the legality of cannabinoids within China. Those laws in China are not for pharmaceutical drugs that (Sinopharm, a state owned pharmaceutical company..as example) are regulated and controlled by the government and dispensed by prescription through doctors and hospitals. Those are PHARMACEUTICAL DRUGS, including those that have inside their delivery payload mechanism, "advanced derivatives" (over 600 times higher concentration).
Your comment pertains to the RECREATIONAL use of those compounds. We are not a pot stock company, we are PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY developing a new class of drugs. There's a BIG difference. ALL pharmaceutical drugs are banned by law for recreational use.
And a reminder of Pfizer's CEO, Mr. Robert Bourla's comment.....we have a super heat seeking missle that targets individual cells. Cancer cells have a voracious appetite and a different profile than a healthy cell. Combine a targeting mechanism, a payload delivery mechanism, and a compound inside the payload delivery mechanism, you can now dissolve away a cancerous tumor by the cancer cell shutting itself down.
This type of medical advancement through the use of advanced derivative cannabinoid compounds will have the effect of population growth upon this cradle of civilization that calls this Planet it's home. This will put greater strain on resources such as energy and food. China's development of the Russian Tokamak fusion reactor design will offset vastly the energy component and fusion supplying an abundant supply of clean energy can be applied to producing fresh water from salt water and thereby enabling the irrigation of enormously vast deserts in China and north Africa which will offset the need for higher food production. China's surge into electric vehicles for it's population will also be accomodated by fusion energy.
ps: Do you know how stupid that geopolitical fascist regime is south of the border? First, they legalized heroin in pill form (opiates), secondly their fusion reactor design is not condusive to the natural state of quantum wave fields generated by fusion, thirdly their electric vehicle plans have an energy infrastructure incapable of meeting the additional megawatts of demand to charge electric vehicles. And lastly, their "UAP" problem is focused on the east and west coasts of their country, the Middle East and the China Sea. You would think the NSA and Pentagon by now would realize they are the only ones having a problem where as Russia and China don't have this problem. There is a reason behind that activity focused and targeted upon that fascist regime that wants to rule the world.
PRC laws are for recreational, not pharmaceutical applications.
One last item, it still rings like a loud echo from the CEO of LABS...."if only one of these are approved" when referencing over 20 strong clinical trials, many in late stage. Is it a realistic possibility that many of these clinical trials were conducted in China via the global pharmaceutical partner associated with LABS?
Pain management is one thing, killing off deadly cancer tumors is another thing. One has to set their priorities.