Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Sirona Biochem Corp V.SBM

Alternate Symbol(s):  SRBCF

Sirona Biochem Corp. is a cosmetic ingredient and drug discovery company with a proprietary technology platform developed at its laboratory facility in France with a specialization in the stabilization of carbohydrate molecules. The Company is exploring the areas of diabetes, dyschromia, anti-aging, anti-cellulite and antiviral therapies and relies on a business model of licensing patents to large organizations in return for up-front and milestone payments as well as royalties. Its two most advanced programs are the cosmetic skin lightener and diabetes drug. The Company's TFC-1067 is for the treatment of Dyschromia (Dark spots on the skin). GlycoProteMim is a novel anti-aging compound. GlycoProteMim is based on the naturally occurring glycoproteins found in Antarctic fish, known to protect them against environmental stressors. It is focused on three current antiviral categories: Neuraminidase Inhibitors, Nucleoside Analogs and Iminosugars. Its wholly owned subsidiary is TFChem S.A.R.L.


TSXV:SBM - Post by User

Comment by biorunon Apr 25, 2023 7:30am
100 Views
Post# 35411840

RE:News without news😃

RE:News without news😃Seriously? This is very very bizarre especially when you actually look at the scientific results. Why is this not hitting the news wire for pests sake?

Density, inflammation and oxidation 37 to 54%?

Those look like statistically very massive numbers? I am not a skin clinician but this clearly looks on surface as impactful if not better than filling your face with needles? 

So these results and last week Howard clears a relatively massive inside private placement.

Howard - you really need to explain!



<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>