RE:RE:RE:72% CR at any point in time.Hi Wildbird, no offense, I appreciate your attempts to help us arrive at a better understanding of the numbers, but I don’t pretend or mislead. To further explain my comment: the ordering principle in these swimmer plots is the number of assessments patients have received: those who received 5 assessments appear on top, those who received only one, appear at the bottom. In our case we have 10 patients who received only their 90 days assessment and who apparently (if the key to the plot is accurate) will not receive further treatment/assessment. Nine out of these 10 are NR. They will be stuck at the bottom of the plot forever (or until they are officially removed from the study), and the same faith waits for any other patient that for whatever reason doesn’t move beyond their 90-days assessment. What we learn from the swimmer plots is that in this trial not everybody receives the two treatments and the full five assessments. For reasons unknown to us, some patients only make it to the 90-days assessment, others only to 180 days, and so on. We can also see that a patient is more likely to receive the maintenance treatment and follow-up assessments if they are CR or IR, and that that a patient is likely to receive no further assessment when they at some point become NR. There are exceptions (like the one you refer to, and also #34 who achieved CR at 90 and 180 days but apparently does not continue), but the tendency is clear: well-responding patients move up in the plot while non-responding patients remain stuck at the point of their last assessment meaning they will become overrepresented in the lower part of the plot, which also means that making comparisons between such plots is tricky business and needs to be done very carefully.