RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:72% CR at any point in time.NotinKansas, thank's for responding to my post. I like it when peoples take the the time to respond.
I read your last 5 posts.
Let's see....
1) You pretend that the "non-responding patients collect at the bottom"(your exact word) of the Swimmer Plot.
2) In the Nov,2022 Swimmer Plot there was 10 NR(red dot) patients at the bottom of the Swimmer Plot.
3) In the April,2023 Swimmer Plot there is 9 NR(red dot) patients at the bottom of the Swimmer Plot.
4) In the April,2023 Swimmer Plot, 9 new patients have completed their 90 days assesment.
5) Out of these 9 new patients, we can easily assume that at the least 2-3 patients would end up NR(red dot) at 90 days, let's make it 3NR for now(I like 3).
Now let's do the math....
In the Nov,2022 Swimmer Plot there was 10 NR(red dot) patients at the bottom of the Swimmer Plot + 3 NR(red dot) /9 new patients for a total of 13 NR(red dot) patients.
In short ...The number of NR(red dot) patients at the bottom of the April,2023 Swimmer Plot should have gone up to 13 NR(red dot) patients.
Houston!!!! We have a big problem!!! Because instead of going up to 13NR, the NR(red dot)number went down to 9 NR(red dot) patients at the bottom of the April,2023 Swimmer Plot.
There is only 2 possible reasons for the above.
- NotinKansas your numbers are misleading.
- Or TLT treatment is so good that out of the 9 new patients treated 10 are CR, that is why the NR (red dot) number went down by 1 in the April,2023 Swimmer Plot.
That is what you call one hell of a good treatment( I didn't know TLT treatment was so good that it could resuscitate patients).
NotinKansas you made a smart move by keeping your TLT shares.
Will be waiting for your answer.