Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Quantum BioPharma Ltd C.QNTM

Alternate Symbol(s):  QNTM

Quantum BioPharma Ltd. is a Canada-based biopharmaceutical company. The Company is engaged in building a portfolio of assets and biotech solutions for the treatment of challenging neurodegenerative and metabolic disorders and alcohol misuse disorders with drug candidates in different stages of development. Through its wholly owned subsidiary, Lucid Psycheceuticals Inc. (Lucid), it is focused on the research and development of its lead compound, Lucid-MS, which is a patented new chemical entity to prevent and reverse myelin degradation, the underlying mechanism of multiple sclerosis. Its unbuzzd beverage is a proprietary formulation of vitamins and minerals to help with liver and brain function for the purposes of relieving the effects of alcohol consumption and restoring a normal lifestyle. It maintains a portfolio of strategic investments through its wholly owned subsidiary, FSD Strategic Investments Inc., which represents loans secured by residential or commercial property.


CSE:QNTM - Post by User

Post by DavidRosenbergon May 03, 2023 10:26pm
108 Views
Post# 35429084

Defender examples

Defender examples
Defending against patent infringement claims during a cease and desist can be a challenging and complex process, and success depends on a variety of factors, including the strength of the patent in question, the evidence available to support the claims, and the legal strategies employed by both parties.
 
However, there have been some successful examples of defending against patent infringement claims during a cease and desist, including:
 
Nintendo Co. Ltd. v. Anascape Ltd.: In this case, Anascape Ltd. claimed that Nintendo had infringed on its patents related to gaming controllers. Nintendo argued that the patents were invalid and that their products did not infringe on the patents in question. Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of Nintendo, finding that Anascape's patents were invalid and not infringed by Nintendo's products.

 
Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Acceleron LLC: In this case, Acceleron LLC claimed that Hewlett-Packard had infringed on its patents related to inkjet printing technology. Hewlett-Packard argued that the patents were invalid and that their products did not infringe on the patents in question. The court ruled in favor of Hewlett-Packard, finding that the patents were invalid and that Hewlett-Packard's products did not infringe on the patents.

 
Apple Inc. v. Motorola Mobility LLC: In this case, Motorola Mobility LLC claimed that Apple had infringed on its patents related to wireless communication technology. Apple argued that the patents were invalid and that their products did not infringe on the patents in question. The court ruled in favor of Apple, finding that the patents were invalid and that Apple's products did not infringe on the patents.
Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC v. Immersion Corporation: In this case, Immersion Corporation claimed that Sony had infringed on its patents related to haptic feedback technology in video game controllers.

Sony argued that the patents were invalid and that their products did not infringe on the patents in question. The court ruled in favor of Sony, finding that the patents were invalid and that Sony's products did not infringe on the patents.
These cases demonstrate that it is possible to successfully defend against patent infringement claims during a cease and desist. However, it is important to note that each case is unique, and the outcome will depend on the specific circumstances and evidence involved. It is therefore essential to work with experienced patent attorneys and develop a strong legal strategy to maximize the chances of success.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>