Mg FERTILIZER - Earthrenew -
- was - dealing in liquid fertilizers
- is - switching to granulated
- has - supply chain issues ( overseas ? )
- more profit in granulated - more profitable
- relies on - biologicals ( microbial digesters )
https://ceo.ca/@newswire/earthrenew-announces-business-update-and-2022-fourth
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How could another compete with magnesium fertilizer ?
- having your own deposits surely helps - no supply chain issues
- sulphur pellet dissolves bonds with magnesium - Mg sulphate
- no need for biologial microbes ( major cost savings )
- plants readily consume + digest magnesium sulphate
- why add biologicals when they actually eat the sulpur - lol
- biological microbes actually would be eating what the plants need - lol
Based on last post reads, it's either others don't like the idea or,
shadowbanning the post.
Mg fertilizer idea is - fantastic, own opinion.
It's doable.
Low cost start up.
Done correctly, one could stock pile reserves in silos.
Carbon cycle - all about plants, enzymes, photosynthesis, magnesium
Plants, Animals, Humans require carbon, we eat it.
MgCO3, has already sequestered the carbon in a bond
Mining and buring it off = mgo - causes co2 off gas emmissions
Leaving the co3 intact to Mg - no conversion of gas
If co3 is contained, it's sequestered - bonded to Mg
If sulphur added to pellet and water added by farmer later
Causes the sulphur to convert to sulpur acid
Sulphur acid bonds to Mg creating = Magnesium sulphate
Magnesium sulphate = food for plant
This process ( mg sulpur pellet ) has just eliminates several
cost factors associated to - mining extraction and conversion equipment.
As for the image in prior post, only one i could find
to demonstrate the pellet layering - lol
But you get the idea.
If one were to compare costs to mine Mg
Extraction equipt
Furnace costs to ( melt )
Effort to squeeze into battery sector, or other, versus....
Simple fertilizer, hey..... far easier to produce a fertilizer.
Cost savings
Profit margins
Each of these applied to fertilizer would most likely,
ring in far cheaper to spark up, and more profitable.
Why more profitable ?
Mg metal mine model was never a high purity. metal, lol,
Chintzing the shareholder - wink.
A pea or feasability study for metal mrlt would surely
soak up much of the profits into, equipt, wafes, financiers,
whereas, shareholders would never really see a profit.
Once the business has a bit of brwathing room, 5 - years out
Financier usually offers more funfung to take the profits into
junior + financiers corner, racking up more debt or shares, to
further distance the shareholders from seeing gains.
Fertilizer = low start up.
Creates an end product
= maximum value / profits. from get go.
Cheers...