What a difference politics, investors & geography makes... Take a look and compare
Canada Nickel Company https://canadanickel.com/
V.CNC https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/quote/CNC.V?p=CNC.V&.tsrc=fin-srch
Canada Nickel is advancing the new Crawford nickel-cobalt sulphide discovery with large scale potential located in the established Timmins mining camp adjacent to major infrastructure.
Canada Nickel owns 100% of Crawford
**This company has absolutely nothing except the
promise and potential of a nickel mine in the Timmins area.
Meanwhile, compare this to Sherritt which has an operating and producing Ni mine in Cuba. Sherritt, the company has been around for 70 years. Way longer than Canada Nickel.
So...what are some of the key differences between these 2 companies that allows Canada Nickel to have a share price of ~$1.50 and a projected $4 - 1 year price while Sherritt with a share price of ~$0.50 is only projected to have a $1 share price in a years time? And Sherritt has all these positives, high Ni demand for quality Ni, high Ni price etc.
I hope someone has the "data points" to be able to explain this to me. It seems quite lop-sided?
I just can't put my finger on it. Anyone care to hypothesize and enlighten me?