RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Seabridge vs TudorThanks for asking TecPro, and let me tell you why I have a lot to say about Tudor. They will be giving Canadian Junior Mining a bad reputation if allowed to proceed on this basis. I work in this business, and I don’t want to see it damaged yet again.
World largest new gold deposit, of coarse I was excited and interested, so I read the recent technical report. How did it come out with the blue sky mine (great song by the way) potential of 30+ million ounces? Does this remind you of another Canadian firm from the 1990’s with a project in Indonesia? I’m not saying Treaty Creek is fraud, but in my opinion it is deception on a massive scale. The company directors, independent QP’s and the regulators are asleep at the wheel for letting it get this far without proper factual basis. This is not an oxide deposit in central Nevada. Its all there in section 13 of the MRE report. Sure its too technical for the average shareholder to understand, but the project is not going happen as promoted. The investor protection mechanism (NI43-101) has been gamed, and Tudor just keep going. It is another disaster for TSX.V confidence waiting to happen. Stop raising money to drill, and for funding insiders, and issue a PEA, or I’ll keep posting. Sure I’ll be called names, a short sheller, or stay in Ontario; so what. Morningstar are id**ts if they rate Tudor a buy, and they should hire a metallurgist before making that statement. I’m also not a Seabridge shareholder as the project has too much capital risk, but at least they have positive economics and aren’t gaming the system.