RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Financials LOL! ". . . pull some intrinsically positive news out of his "a-s".
Well said Dunmont.
My comments were more intended to address past failings on the part of Mr. Nazarpour &Co and why the NanoXplore share price is not responding as perhaps expected.
As I said, what needs to be said regarding past failings and precisely the methodology utilized by or on behalf of NanoXplore management and BOD collectively, in order to contribute to NanoXplote "minority" shareholders having been essentially set up to have our respective equity holdings value fiscally raped and pillaged (a nearer to five year low GRA share price was achieved as a result), simply needs to be cited as a primary reason for would be retail GRA shareholders hessitance to come back to purchasing NanoXplore shares and thereby supporting the share price reach loftier heights.
As for potentially purchasing institutional shareholders, that is the most difficult part to the equation.
Institutional shareholders and their respective high net worth clients consider NanoXplore as having justifyably been relegated to the "show me" catagory of potential investments. NanoXplore is essentially on a relatively longer term watch list for the various potential institutional investor and their respective high net worth clients and retail clients as well.
I agree that Mr. Nazarpour "and the Board can just continue to keep their collective heads down and keep their collective eyes of the longer term game plan." I also agree that for now "they seem to be on target, and despite the lacklustre share price, the game plan is working out as planned" Dumont.
Here's the rub though. It would clearly be the case that everything working out as planned simply does not include the requisite steadily appreciating NanoXplore share price and we know investment capital allocation on the part of all kinds equity markets participants takes on a relatively much more discriminating bias, in terms of where one's capital is allowed to remain during this equities markey period at hand.
I could suggest the Quebec provincial government representatives and the Canadian Federal Government representatives would be seeking to "pull some intrinsically positive grants and "Canadian Growth Fund capital investments" support relating news out of their "a-s" in the meanwhile. This way, perhaps the institutional investment managers and their high net worth clients can trigger the flow of equities investors into taking up a position here with NanoXplore.
By the way, I have little use for equities analysts share price projections. Such projections are always suggestive of wholly unrealistic share price levels which are either too late or far too early in nature.
None likes to think their money is going off to die for the next 3 years when taking up a common shers equity investment with NanoXplore.
Obviously, NanoXplore doesn't pay a dividend and historically the company's CEO seems to simply relish the opportunity to pooh-pooh NanoXplore investors who are also focused on shareholder appreciation being attained by way of share price appreciation as well as a improvement in fundamental company performance.
In my opinion and based on past behaviors and statements attributable to Mr. Soroush Nazarpour, Soroush Nazarpour seems to look down his nose at and seems to have a ever present disdain for NanoXplore "minority" shareholders.
All this being said, I am still holding all of my NanoXplore shares. Primariliy because I expect - sooner than you do perhaps - company news which will drive higher NanoXplore's share price.