RE:RE:RE:FYIHARJAY wrote: developbc
I was refering to share using the exact same words on Stockhouse as pennytodollar used on CEO.
COINCIDENCE or same person using using two different aliases on two different sites.
Actually Pennytodollar is a true long and he is pointing out as I stated previously and exposing the false narrative that Vale won't be switching to plasma from the article. The article is talking about replacing anthracite coal currently used by Vale with biocarbon...so I agree with Pennytodollar.
@pennytodollar Genius - post the article linking to Vale replacing coal in pelletization and claim we lost out...... oh yeah we aren't replacing coal with plasma torches ..... we're replacing heavy fuel burners.... wrong plant Sherlock Yes indeed as article stated it is focusing replacing coal w biocarbon. PYR plasma torches is targeting to replace the diesel burners...NOT even the same application!!!!!:
"Vale has announced that for the first time it has managed to produce commercial-quality iron ore pellets on an industrial scale without using anthracite coal.
In a test carried out in a pellet plant in Vargem Grande, Minas Gerais, Vale replaced 100% of the fossil fuel with biocarbon to fire the pellets (small balls of iron ore used to make steel). Biocarbon is a renewable, zero-emission product obtained by carbonising biomass, it explained."