Future OptionsBack when STZ created a degree of seperation from Canopy the way I saw this was, STZ was not comfortable with the current landscape and or direction required to keep the company going, so it came down to 3 options:
1) Canopy proved their business model on their own and upon full legalization STZ would come back in.
2) Canopy fails as an MJ company but has limited success (ie: Biosteel), this would allow STZ to sell off the failed companies and aquire the rest for pennies.
3) Canopy fails entirely and it's major shareholders question the decisions the company has taken (the sharks come out to mitigate) I would imagine STZ would not be excluded from putting theselfs at the top of that creditor list.
It's up to each individual to figure out at which stage and which (if any) of these scenarios is valid, or not.
JMHO