Correction
I don't like to spread false calculation. I made a post a few week's ago about the number of shares of Hexo if it didn't split. There were two splits, 4 and 14 that egal 56 and I used 56 to multiply the lastest count of shares at that time. I should have used the number of shares just after the second split since new shares were issues after the second split that are not affected by the multiplication of 56.
Though it doesn't change a lot about the astronomic count of shares of Hexo.