Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Nevada Copper Corp NEVDQ

Nevada Copper Corp is a Canada-based mining company. The Company is engaged in the development, operation, and exploration of its copper project (the Project) at its Pumpkin Hollow Property (the Property) in Western Nevada, United States of America. Its two fully permitted projects include the high-grade Underground Mine and processing facility, which is undergoing a restart of operations, and a large-scale open pit PFS stage project. The Property is located in northwestern Nevada and consists of approximately 24,300 acres of contiguous mineral rights including approximately 10,800 acres of owned private land and leased patented claims. Pumpkin Hollow is located approximately 8 miles southeast of the small town of Yerington, Nevada in Lyon County, one- and one-half hours drive southeast of Reno. The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary is Nevada Copper, Inc.


GREY:NEVDQ - Post by User

Comment by bogfiton Jun 10, 2023 10:27am
97 Views
Post# 35489892

RE:RE:RE:Pumpkin Hollow's Open Pit Vs CMMC's Eva Project

RE:RE:RE:Pumpkin Hollow's Open Pit Vs CMMC's Eva Project"All info regarding grade and cpp is available online should anyone want to look into this more.  There are no rules on how little or how much info I need to share on my posts."

LOL Wa-wa-wa!  You have no idea what you’re talkin' about!   What I am trying to explain to you is that any comparison between projects that are only based upon sale price in an acquisition is basically NONSENSE!   How about the debt level a project has incurred? That wouldn't be important to you?

Wouldn’t that be a fundamental consideration to be included in any comparisons?  Of course, it should.  It’s just plain silly to mouth half a story while ignoring the fundamental characteristics that determine profitably.  Silly rabbit!

Not that nonsense is any new frontier for your posts, but cleverly you make a correct assessment when you say you are not constrained by rules, nor apparently reason as well. We’re NOT taking about “rules”, but rather of making sense.

You did mention the feasibility study which informs you of the economic characteristics of mining the project, and then ramble on ignoring the basic tenet of a FS i.e., profitability.  What I pick up from your posts is a profound ignorance of the mining industry, so often the downfall of a newbie.

Personally, I fail to see any value in attempting straight on comparison of mining projects because so many variables determine the eventual profitability and LOM.

b.




<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>