RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:11FUD posts in 4 hours from TamarackFUDNewsday101 wrote: dalesio_98 wrote: ScienceFirst wrote: Your the loser Tamarackflop.
- you lost any credibility by pumping EXRO till the day of bankruptcy, without even seeing the many red flags that a 6th-grader would have seen
- on Feb. 1st, like a real amateure, you pumped EXRO at 3$ saying the the "volume" was the best indicator and that it would easily break 3$ within days. EXRO went completely the opposite direction of your call, now trading at 2$!!!
-your 1000+ FUD posts are just a proof that you're lacking intelligence in your analysis
You're simply an armchair quarterback. And this comes from your narcissic personnality.
__________
tamaracktop - (6/21/2023 2:34:29 PM)
RE:RE:RE:11FUD posts in 4 hours from TamarackFUD
You're the loser Science.
I've been posting facts while this stock has tanked.
You're the one repeating your pointless bs.
Bye again.
Please proof read your content before submitting the text.
EXRO ... bankruptcy.
Perhaps you meant XBC under CCAA.
You apparently don't know the difference between CCAA and bankruptcy.
Question for the genius making a big fuzz about the difference between bankruptcy and protection under CCAA.
what the difference for XBC shareholders?
None because at the end their XBC shares are worth zero...
Ask the one that doesn't know the difference between CCAA and bankruptcy. There is also BIA.
This pertains to all shareholders affected by companies that are insolvent, seeking creditor protection, NOI, BIA and bankruptcy. Add to this the seemingly orchestrated CCAA scenarios with fire sales and privatizations.
This is not about XBC.
My public LinkedIn profile could be viewed by searching my name (less the _98) and bankruptcy inspector.