RE:RE:why add a geologist to tudor's board of directors I was not questioning tudor's choice for a new director. I was wondering what could be inferred about tudor's business plan for treaty creek from their decision to add geological expertise to their board of directors.. at this point in its developmental destiny..
It is obvious to me that the splitting treaty creek into two or more properties would allow tudor to pursue treaty creek's blue sky potential -- in the best interests of acreating more value for the shareholders. Otherwise, the sale of treaty creek gives the buyer all the potential benefits of the blue sky potential...
There is potential for a new discoveries in the perfect storm area of the property.. Ken konkin said the eureka area might be the cap of an underlying area of more significant mineralization. The whole northern and southern areas of the treaty creek claim block have barely been explored. There is a tonne of potential blue sky opportunities sitting at the heart of the world class sulpherets mineralized system. The three amigoes away from that kind of blue sky potential is puzzling ..
If the company is thinking along the lines I've just inferred that they may be thinking their creation of a larger geological bench on the board of directors makes perfect sense to this teuton shareholder .. The ownership of the treaty creek