RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:I think there might be a problem.."Not sure if you are a shorter, a disgruntled employee, retarded or just have an axe to grind with Peter for whatever reason but that comparison is BEYOND RIDICULOUS!!!!!!"
I'm quite certain I'm not developmentally challenged, to be politically correct, and my reference to "a rowboat" wasn't a comparison, it was an analogy.
Marseille asks why I can't provide a reason for my negative posts.
One reason is that while the bears here have supported their opinions by citing facts, the best the bulls can do is insult those who's opinions don't align with theirs. I find it particularly annoying.
Almost painful to see blind ignorance.
I have yet to see a single sound argument in favor of this stock that's based on solid facts.
The bears, who have presented their case and supported it by their citing financials, have been proven correct, but are greeted with nothing but derision.
It's really quite sad actually.
You're one of them.
It's the incessant rah rah pumpers who offer completely baseless groundless arguments suggesting that this stock is going much higher that are out of line.
I don't empathize with them at all.
Obviously your one of them.
The sad fact is that anyone who has looked at the well-supported, reasoned bear case in the past objectively, and who has acted on it, is better off today than anyone who hasn't.
Sad for you anyway.