RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Good QuestionsYou are also an annonymous poster who has never posted on any topic on this thread.
"My understanding was that TUD would get $$$$$$$$ from SEA for letting them build tunnel"
Please post a link or stop posting hypothetical and inaccurate information.
Until this is rectified SEA sits in a very uneasy situation. If you can't see that oh well.
I'm resting easy with my shares-:)
Larry60 wrote: TeckPro wrote: If it worries you (and you claim to be an investor) sell and get out!
I'm going to buy more as I believe that SEA did something that TUD didn't like during obviously long negotiations.
We are not privy to all the internal discussions between the companies, but clearly someone wants to force their way and that's caused this issue
We have nothing to lose as WE ARE ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE MOUNTAIN.
Just using some CAPS.... tit for tat-:)
If I have any conern or worry about an issue with a holding, I should just sell it? Or, in the alternative, just take the advice of an anon internet poster that there is nothing to worry about??????
Really?
Clearly SEA has run out of patience and is moving ahead. Now TUD is spending $$ to try and stop them. My understanding was that TUD would get $$$$ from SEA for letting them build tunnel.
What worries me more is SEAs NR. Now maybe they are not being forthright, but they specifically state that TUDs argument is that the govt does not have the right to grant the right of way. Id have to agree with SEA that its a frivolous argument. Now, if TUD is really arguing the govt must take their economic interest into account, thats a different story.
I hope SEA was just being overconfident. I really do.