RE:RE:RE:Soon 3 months without any news....This time around I wasn't the one who suggested what you've taken exception to Dumont.
Will101 made a comment and I replied to Will101's comment.
As for me suggesting Mr. Soroush Nazarpour &Co likely favor the 50% of the largest NanoXplore stakeholders, I'll simply point you to comments which Mr. Nazarpour himself made during that particular quarterly conference call when NanoXplore announced it's five year strategic business development investment plan.
During that quarterly conference call, what Mr. Nazarpour seemed to be primarily concerned with was those 50% of the largest NanoXplore shareholders; and he made a specific point in emphasizing their already provisioned support of NanoXplore management not primarily pursuing adjusted EBITDA profitability throughout the incremental rollout of five year strategic business development investment plan.
During that particular quarterly CC, Mr. Nazarpour essentially went out of his way to avoid speaking to anything at all having to do with the VoltaXplore enterprise and yet quite intentionally rammed home - with great resutling impact - his point with respect to NanoXplore's priority not being the company attaining and sustaining adjusted EBITDA profitability throughout the rollout of said five year investment plan.
Whether intentionally or inadvertently, we know that Mr. Nazarpour's comments regarding adjusted EBITDA not being the priority during the rollout of said five year plan ensured to have the NanoXplore share price experience the wrath of fundamentals prioritizing kinds of NanoXplore investors, persons who decided to bail on NanoXplore because of that specific comment which Mr. Nazarpour clearly conveyed during the quarterly CC in question.
Understand that when it comes to NanoXplore management and historically where the bodies are buried, so to speak, I am not one of those NanoXplore "minority" investors who is not knowledgeable about such things. I have experienced the phases of utter destruction of NanoXplore's share price and held all along Dumont.
Ask yourself whether you had done the same Dumont.
So, when you speak of "evidence" you should do well to keep all of the preceding in mind.
Also understand that I hold as much disdain for Mr. Nazarpour & Co "thin skin", so to speak, as Mr. Nazarpour & Co seem to me to historically demonstrate toward NanoXplore "minority" shareholders Dumont.
The more some suggest certain things have changed here with NanoXplore, the more we once again come to realize that certain things remain the same or are little changed Dumont.
Please note that I have shelved my NanoXplore investment for the remainder of this year and possibly well into next year Dumont.
After all, based on past experience here with NanoXplore, the commercial agreement with a well recognized chemicals company being nearer to being realized "shtick", something which Mr. Nazarpour & Co were "selling" during the Q3 conference call, was, in my opinion, just another baiting and luring of existing NanoXplore shareholders and unsuspecting would be NanoXplore shareholders - just like the VoltaXplore enterprise had once been utilized as baited lure.
Me and my "very incisive, informative, thought provoking" provisioning of NanoXplore related information will be taking a extended holiday from posting here for the foreseeable future Dumont.