RE:RE:RE:DISCORD CALL TODAY...inviolablspirit wrote: Keep in mind that MG can't discuss financials in a discord, it is not an official place to release news or information that is considered material... and any finacial information is material information. It would need to be released in a news release, which it will be at the end of the month in the Q2 financials. MG has mentioned this so many times in discords. Why people have yet to grasp this, I don't understand. So, yes you can always expect the discords to be repetitive information with some clarification on a few things and some upates on timelines. This is still good information to get.
Inviolable, I read you but to give you an example of where I would like to MG to address less technical issues is a question I raised with IR regarding Canada Superclusters.
For those unaware, the GoC around 2017 launched the Supercluster initiative, focusing on 5 sectors meant to help develop emerging initiatives, expected to give Canadian businesses a global edge. These superclusters focus on Digital Tech, Protein, Manufacturing, Logistics AI (Scale AI) and Ocean.
In February of this year the GoC announced the allocation of $700M for these inititative, leading into 2028, each receiving somehwere between $125-$150M and in which business get, roughly, $1 in grants for each $2 invested in nascent/emerging technologies.
Given that, I think, DM could benefit from at least 3 of these Supercluster initiatives (i.e. Scale AI for NexaSMART, AnalyticsGPT and SMART Factory; Digital for DMevs, eHealth, Fin/Insurance inititiaves, and; Manufacturing for SMART Factory) I asked if DM had explored or may consider joining such inititiaves, not asking for details but simply getting a sense as to whether it may express interest in accessing such grants... I simply wish MG could have taken 1 min to address the question, which I feel could have been responded to without leaking priviledged information.
I feel addressing such issues could give more "flavour" to the Discord calls, instead of re-hashing elements already addressed through other forums (i.e. Agoracom) or being a repeat of previous Doscord calls.
But, perhaps, some are content with the current format or that I'm simply expecting too much...